Location:
Driving Status:
Preparing For School
Social Link:
Truth seeker.
Posted: 8 years, 6 months ago
View Topic:
... was enlisted in the National Guard prior to my CDL training with them and two months in a row they violated my rights under the Uniformed Services Employment and ReEmployment Act of 1994 by refusing to allow me to leave for my monthly drill, I saved coorespondence my taking pictures of the Qualcomm in my truck ...
According to the original post... I think he has indicated that 1) he was already in the NG before he entered into the contract with CRST and 2) he communicated properly (and has documentation of that communication) re his required duty time to the NG.
If that's the case... i.e. if CRST knew he was in the NG before the contract was signed and he followed proper procedures re the scheduling of his time-off relating to his NG service... then, it seems to me, the onus may very well be on CRST to justify their position/actions a bit more precisely.
this is how I saw it, too. it seems that old school and the other moderators automatically assume a driver at odds with one of these mega trucking companies over some issue must be in the wrong. no wonder the op bailed on his thread.
Posted: 8 years, 6 months ago
View Topic:
A loofah??? and you want to be a truckdriver
Posted: 8 years, 6 months ago
View Topic:
Legally bound by CRST
To clarify, I am actually an experienced driver, with just about two years in. The first year I did with one of the megas, so, had I said anything about them, I would have been speaking from experience. I didn't really take the bio seriously, except for the truth seeker part.
What I said and what you just admitted is that you made assumptions that contradict what the op said. You assumed that he wasn't telling the truth substantially. Who knows? Maybe he isn't. I just find it strange that you and the other moderators always seem to do this. Your "truth" seems to be very company centric.