Joe Biden has condemned all violent protests.
Actions speak louder than words. He will reverse himself seven times before the end of the month.
Joe Biden has condemned all violent protests.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-condemns-antifa-violent-protests
This article is from Sept. 8, when Biden was falling in the polls. He had no choice. He said nothing after months of rioting. He hasn't condemned them since this one time. Harris, who if Harris/Biden get into the WH and who will conspire with Pelosi to throw sniffing Joe out via article 25, has yet to condemn blm and antifa. She actually raised bail money to bail them out after they were arrested for destroying propety.
Joe Biden has condemned all violent protests.
Actions speak louder than words. He will reverse himself seven times before the end of the month.
Right?
The TIME TO CONDEMN - was MONTHS AGO. And it's still going on in a number of places (I have friends in Portland) - but there is a TOTAL MEDIA BLACKOUT on it.
The left was silent THIS ENTIRE TIME. It's truly LAUGHABLE HOW THEY (cough cough) "condemn" their own shock troops - while leaving BLM completely out of it. (and there's a difference between the sentiment that "black lives matter" - and the political organization whose website openly espouses marxism, and donations went directly to ACTBLUE - where ZERO of the $$ actually went to the benefit of the black community - ALL WENT TO THE DNC).
ter·ror·ism - /ˈterəˌrizəm/ noun the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
Can we call what went on the last 9 months ANYTHING OTHER THAN TERRORISM? REALLY?
Anyone who says otherwise - is SO BLIND - THEY DESERVE WHAT'S COMING IN THE FUTURE.
And the fact that President-Elect Harris PROMISED THERE WOULD BE MORE POST-ELECTION DAY IF DJT WON. (oh that's right - she didn't threaten - she "merely stated fact". Kinda like when she called her running mate A RACIST - then justified it by "oh, that was a debate").
They're Not Gonna Stop - Kamala - in reference to the "mostly peaceful protests".
COME ON MAN...
I was ALMOST SAD that stuff wasn't going on down by me. I would LOVE SOMEONE TO WALK INTO A RESTAURANT I WAS DINING AT - and threaten me and mine.
I wore a "Trump 2020 - F Your Feelings" shirt out to dinner one night. Some 6'5/300lb drunk dude followed me at to the parking lot when I went for a cig - screaming and yelling at me, puffing his chest out/stomping in my direction (then backing off). I felt threatened. I warned him: "look, there are 50 witnesses, cameras all over, and my lawyer is sitting at my table 10 feet away - and YOU ARE THREATENING MY SAFETY. You have 3 seconds to move away from me - and then YOU OWN WHAT HAPPENS NEXT." He backed down. Lucky for him - the paperwork would have been a HUGE PITA.
And now "they" talk about continuing to "persecute" members of DJT's staff - and supporters.
Glad that Kyle Rittenhouse got bonded out. This is going to be a REAL INTERESTING COURT CASE.
People here know me for a long time. We may not hold the same views politically - but no one has ever called me a liar before. I'm a lot of things - but THAT ISN'T ONE OF THEM.
(now to stay on topic - LOL) - how this relates to TRUCKING IS - in many of these incidents - protesters BLOCKED INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS (in violation of both state and FEDERAL LAWS regarding freedom of motion on federal/interstate roadways) with NO ACCOUNTABILITY. Truck drivers were PULLED FROM THEIR TRUCKS - or FORCED TO RUN THROUGH CROWDS in order to ENSURE THEIR PERSONAL SAFETY.
There was a period of time during the worst of this - where companies were either re-routing drivers AWAY from hot spots, not taking loads IN hotspots - or allowing drivers to use their own discretion as to whether or not they wanted to get ANYWHERE NEAR AREAS where their safety could be put in jeopardy.
Let me repeat:
ter·ror·ism - /ˈterəˌrizəm/ noun the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
If that's NOT WHAT WE'VE WITNESSED - I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS. Just because they weren't wearing suicide vests, doesn't mean their behavior doesn't match THE TEXTBOOK DEFINITION OF TERRORISM (because they are too much a bunch of wuss's to put REAL SKIN in the game - running away when confronted by people willing to defend themselves - then CRY RACISM OR OTHER VICTIMHOOD when they get their butts handed to them).
I didn't have any Trump stickers on my vehicle - concerned I would have to hurt someone for messing with MY PROPERTY and violating MY RIGHT TO AN OPINION. Yet - I never even considered doing anything to someone with a Biden sticker - BECAUSE THAT'S NOT HOW WE ROLL (as tempting as it is).
Trump may well be an a-hole - but ANYONE ON THE LEFT CLAIMING SOME MORAL HIGH GROUND for what y'all have done the last year (last FIVE ACTUALLY) is a SELF DELUSIONAL BALD FACED LIAR...
Rick (sorry if my comments were a little vague...)
Commercial trade, business, movement of goods or money, or transportation from one state to another, regulated by the Federal Department Of Transportation (DOT).
Operating While Intoxicated
Joe Biden has condemned all violent protests.
Actions speak louder than words. He will reverse himself seven times before the end of the month.
If Harris/Biden make it to the WH, Harris will take over with the help of Pelosi via article 25. Harris has yet to condemn the violence.
Joe Biden has condemned all violent protests.
Actions speak louder than words. He will reverse himself seven times before the end of the month.
The left was silent THIS ENTIRE TIME. It's truly LAUGHABLE HOW THEY (cough cough) "condemn" their own shock troops - while leaving BLM completely out of it. (and there's a difference between the sentiment that "black lives matter" - and the political organization whose website openly espouses marxism, and donations went directly to ACTBLUE - where ZERO of the $$ actually went to the benefit of the black community - ALL WENT TO THE DNC).
ter·ror·ism - /ˈterəˌrizəm/ noun the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
Joe Biden has condemned all violent protests.
Actions speak louder than words. He will reverse himself seven times before the end of the month.
The left was silent THIS ENTIRE TIME. It's truly LAUGHABLE HOW THEY (cough cough) "condemn" their own shock troops - while leaving BLM completely out of it. (and there's a difference between the sentiment that "black lives matter" - and the political organization whose website openly espouses marxism, and donations went directly to ACTBLUE - where ZERO of the $$ actually went to the benefit of the black community - ALL WENT TO THE DNC).
Joe Biden has condemned all violent protests.
Actions speak louder than words. He will reverse himself seven times before the end of the month.
Correct. But nevertheless he did condemn violence. Simple as that.
It doesn't matter which party is in charge. The Federal Government reacts to the economy, it doesn't create the economy.
The United States will survive and thrive under any president as one man(person) is not capable of ever changing that.
All the president does in the end is accept credit or receive blame for the ups and downs of the economy.
The United States will survive and thrive under any president as one man(person) is not capable of ever changing that.
I would agree with this except it is more than one person. Half the country feels the way he does and we won't be the USA anymore if they actually win the runoff elections in GA. They will push as much stuff through as they can, and it will be the end of America as we know it. We will become a socialist state and probably collapse, because we can't support it.
New! Check out our help videos for a better understanding of our forum features
Joe Biden has condemned all violent protests.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-condemns-antifa-violent-protests